Page 1 of 1
Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 18:31
by nelson
Hi,
why array can have only 512 elements? please, do small revolution in this

usine should be soft without limits (such a low limits

Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 20:32
by amiga909
nelson wrote:Hi,
why array can have only 512 elements? please, do small revolution in this

usine should be soft without limits (such a low limits

where? what?
(code example please)
Posted: 04 Jan 2009, 20:59
by nelson
I mean Array module in Usine - in code also - max numer of elements is 512.
Posted: 05 Jan 2009, 08:27
by bsork
You can create larger arrays within scripts, and I'm fairly certain that you can do that in user modules as well.
As Amiga909 ask: Do you have an example? Not necessarily a code example, but a description of what you want to achieve.
Posted: 05 Jan 2009, 20:11
by nelson
what i want to achieve:
I wrote my own user module that generate long sequence of values. Its implementation of L-system that return array of values - I'm using it as midi code1 values. L-systems generates sometimes very long streams of values - yes, I can partition it, or send midi values directly from user module, but in this case its nessesery to have it in array outside user module (on array out) so I need to have more than 1 and partition it...
Its in fact not a big problem in implementation but ... not optimal because of unnatural limit of Array module.
Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 08:54
by senso
I imagine that 512 can be too small in some situations.
I'm thinking about a way to adjust, and increase, this limit in the setup.
Posted: 09 Jan 2009, 09:54
by LevraiBernardo
Being able to increase this upper limit in arrays indexes would be great, but in some situations, changing downer limit can be interesting too. (I mean index start at 0, but in some cases, starting at 1 would fit better). Could we imagine a starting and an ending values for "dynamic range arrays" ?
Posted: 06 Mar 2009, 17:02
by woodslanding
bump.... any more word on this?