Page 1 of 1

Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 23:21
by nay-seven
VVV is more for video works but support more and more audio and now vst

i've test usine vst inside and it's work fine

not really many features for the moment but could be interesting

http://www.vvvv.org/tiki-index.php

Image



and i suppose senso would be happy to know that it's work... ;-)

Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 09:55
by senso
interesting, I'd prefer the inverse (vvvv in Usine) to add video capabilities in Usine!!!

Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 10:31
by runagate
Ah, but as I asked at KVR does this mean that one hardware controller can simultaneously control VST parameters and video fx? Syncronized... that'd be amazing.

Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 12:58
by nay-seven
runagate wrote:does this mean that one hardware controller can simultaneously control VST parameters and video fx? Syncronized
if you talk about VVV , don't see any problem with this , now latency, cpu...can't tell you if it's ok for the moment with many info to send...
senso wrote:I'd prefer the inverse (vvvv in Usine) to add video capabilities in Usine
ha ha , i know , me too
will be more easy and surely more cpuless...

here a little demo of a " pre alpha " project
using VVV as video midi controller or something like this... ;-)


Image

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x66dxk ... ject_music

Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 17:28
by runagate
Might be one of those instances where using OSC to control 2 PCs at once is a good idea ;)