Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 18:54
I've just run Usine on my relatively new tx2500 tablet for the first time (my last laptop suffered an unfortunate electrical accident, RIP), and I am finding the cpu use vs desktop is much higher than I would expect.
The default workspace that loads with Usine (4.2 beta8),running uses between 45-55% of the dual core AMD QL-62 2Ghz cpu with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting.
The same default workspace loaded and running on my intel core 2 quad core 3.5Ghz desktop with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting (for comparison sake I am not using 4 threads) uses 1-2% ! (x2 = 2-4% of two cores)
Lets say that my desktop is 3x faster than the tx2500 while using only two cores, that should still only amount to 12% or maybe even 15- 20% cpu running the same workspace on the tablet, but 45-55%?
Both computers are using the same audio hardware, PCI Express/Expresscard > RME Multiface II set at a 256 sample buffer.
The desktop is running Windows XP 64-bit, the tablet is running Windows 7 evaluation/beta.
Could this big of a performance gap be because of Windows 7, or are the AMD cpu's really not very efficient?
I assume there are at least several of these tablets in use around here. What results are you getting?
The default workspace that loads with Usine (4.2 beta8),running uses between 45-55% of the dual core AMD QL-62 2Ghz cpu with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting.
The same default workspace loaded and running on my intel core 2 quad core 3.5Ghz desktop with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting (for comparison sake I am not using 4 threads) uses 1-2% ! (x2 = 2-4% of two cores)
Lets say that my desktop is 3x faster than the tx2500 while using only two cores, that should still only amount to 12% or maybe even 15- 20% cpu running the same workspace on the tablet, but 45-55%?
Both computers are using the same audio hardware, PCI Express/Expresscard > RME Multiface II set at a 256 sample buffer.
The desktop is running Windows XP 64-bit, the tablet is running Windows 7 evaluation/beta.
Could this big of a performance gap be because of Windows 7, or are the AMD cpu's really not very efficient?
I assume there are at least several of these tablets in use around here. What results are you getting?