ArrayArrayArray
BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2023-03-20T14:52:02+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/70952023-03-20T14:52:02+02:002023-03-20T14:52:02+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44740#p44740in log mode, small changes on low value will give big changes on the result. It corresponds to the log curve: But you're right, it's just a mater of point of view. I think that it's too late now...
]]>2022-12-15T21:03:54+02:002022-12-15T21:03:54+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44613#p44613Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 15 Dec 2022, 20:03
]]>
2022-12-15T11:27:53+02:002022-12-15T11:27:53+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44612#p44612 I have a simple question: why do log/exp scales are programmed with values on X-axis and input on Y-axis?
When I choose "log", I expect a function that gives high values when I move the fader a little bit, then a small amount of values are spread across the rest of the fader.
All other audio softwares (but it's also mathematically logical) that let the user choose a log/exp curve are programmed with the input on X-axis (MIDI keys, MIDI velocity, etc.) and the output on Y-axis (cutoff filter, volume, etc.), which corresponds to f(x) in the mathematical language. In the case of Usine, the fader/knob cursor is the input and the values are the output.
It's counter-intuitive, isn't it? The idea would be to invert the "log" and "exp" names.
Not a big deal, though. I thought there might be a reason hidden under the hood.
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2023-03-20T14:52:02+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/70952023-03-20T14:52:02+02:002023-03-20T14:52:02+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44740#p44740in log mode, small changes on low value will give big changes on the result. It corresponds to the log curve: But you're right, it's just a mater of point of view. I think that it's too late now...
]]>2022-12-15T21:03:54+02:002022-12-15T21:03:54+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44613#p44613Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 15 Dec 2022, 20:03
]]>2022-12-15T11:27:53+02:002022-12-15T11:27:53+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7095&p=44612#p44612 I have a simple question: why do log/exp scales are programmed with values on X-axis and input on Y-axis?
When I choose "log", I expect a function that gives high values when I move the fader a little bit, then a small amount of values are spread across the rest of the fader.
All other audio softwares (but it's also mathematically logical) that let the user choose a log/exp curve are programmed with the input on X-axis (MIDI keys, MIDI velocity, etc.) and the output on Y-axis (cutoff filter, volume, etc.), which corresponds to f(x) in the mathematical language. In the case of Usine, the fader/knob cursor is the input and the values are the output.
It's counter-intuitive, isn't it? The idea would be to invert the "log" and "exp" names.
Not a big deal, though. I thought there might be a reason hidden under the hood.