Not sure to understand the question. The manual explain that (maybe not so clearly)
Most of VST are executed in a single thread and Usine can't do miracles.
87% in usine vs 8% in OSX means that only few cores are running and all others are sleeping.
The best way to reduce the cpu load is to dispatch VST's on different racks, and using audio buses, if you can.
for sure single-core heavy plugins always gonna be a problem. the only solution on horizon is CLAP plugins (I've added thread about it here) that can let host handle multi-threading. according to U-he there are significant performance boosts from this approach.Most of VST are executed in a single thread and Usine can't do miracles.
87% in usine vs 8% in OSX means that only few cores are running and all others are sleeping.
The best way to reduce the cpu load is to dispatch VST's on different racks, and using audio buses, if you can.
Statistics: Posted by x.iso — 04 Jun 2022, 16:39
]]>
]]>
Statistics: Posted by SylvainT — 18 May 2022, 08:44
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
87% in usine vs 8% in OSX means that only few cores are running and all others are sleeping.
The best way to reduce the cpu load is to dispatch VST's on different racks, and using audio buses, if you can.
Statistics: Posted by senso — 28 Apr 2022, 11:28
]]>
"Finally, in Usine the CPU indicates the real time you use to calculate patches, not the average including sleeping cores. It's more like in DSP card (ie Universal Audio UAD) and much more helpful to know the real state of your system."
Statistics: Posted by GenCode — 28 Apr 2022, 10:02
]]>
Statistics: Posted by GenCode — 28 Apr 2022, 09:44
]]>
Couldn't attach pictures for some reason but Usine CPU Shows 87 % and OS X Monitor shows System 1.71 and user only 8.88 .it is a dramatic difference . is it normal ?
Thx GC
Statistics: Posted by GenCode — 28 Apr 2022, 09:41
]]>