Anything involving updating the display--opening a popup window, changing the name or visibility of a control, etc. Don't send audio or midi through them, unless it's just setting the midi channel or resetting the cc number of a control or something like that....
Thanks for clarification.
And if you have a big wkp with a lot of busses, they will reduce your CPU.
Perfect, that's what I wanted to know before I spend a lot of time optimizing my racks (quite a lot of them) because I usually have pretty big wkp's and I was hoping that these help with the CPU strain.
Be aware, they work only within a patch, not between patches, even if they are in the same rack.
]]>2017-03-21T20:49:44+02:002017-03-21T20:49:44+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36881#p36881 But they can clean up your patches! And if you have a big wkp with a lot of busses, they will reduce your CPU.
Be aware, they work only within a patch, not between patches, even if they are in the same rack.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 21 Mar 2017, 19:49
Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 09 Mar 2017, 18:59
]]>2017-03-09T14:22:51+02:002017-03-09T14:22:51+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36837#p36837Statistics: Posted by lytz1 — 09 Mar 2017, 13:22
]]>
2017-03-08T01:58:29+02:002017-03-08T01:58:29+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36831#p36831 In which cases makes it the most sense to use Quick Links instead of regular cables in terms of saving CPU Cycles?
Anything involving updating the display--opening a popup window, changing the name or visibility of a control, etc. Don't send audio or midi through them, unless it's just setting the midi channel or resetting the cc number of a control or something like that....
Thanks for clarification.
And if you have a big wkp with a lot of busses, they will reduce your CPU.
Perfect, that's what I wanted to know before I spend a lot of time optimizing my racks (quite a lot of them) because I usually have pretty big wkp's and I was hoping that these help with the CPU strain.
Be aware, they work only within a patch, not between patches, even if they are in the same rack.
]]>2017-03-21T20:49:44+02:002017-03-21T20:49:44+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36881#p36881 But they can clean up your patches! And if you have a big wkp with a lot of busses, they will reduce your CPU.
Be aware, they work only within a patch, not between patches, even if they are in the same rack.
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 21 Mar 2017, 19:49
Statistics: Posted by sm_jamieson — 09 Mar 2017, 18:59
]]>2017-03-09T14:22:51+02:002017-03-09T14:22:51+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36837#p36837Statistics: Posted by lytz1 — 09 Mar 2017, 13:22
]]>2017-03-08T01:58:29+02:002017-03-08T01:58:29+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5697&p=36831#p36831 In which cases makes it the most sense to use Quick Links instead of regular cables in terms of saving CPU Cycles?