ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/512 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2458#p2458 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
Please keep Usine stable and quick... there must be a lightest solution.
I second that.

Statistics: Posted by moody33 — 28 Jul 2007, 13:02

]]> 2007-07-28T10:18:43+02:00 2007-07-28T10:18:43+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2455#p2455 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
I can't really say I've noticed that recalling presets is slow, and I've been testing with the modules that have the inlet - like the array, step etc. All of them I assume more complex to create/destroy than a simple fader or button.

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 28 Jul 2007, 10:18

]]> 2007-07-26T17:42:03+02:00 2007-07-26T17:42:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2447#p2447 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> Statistics: Posted by stanlea — 26 Jul 2007, 17:42

]]> 2007-07-26T15:42:33+02:00 2007-07-26T15:42:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2446#p2446 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> I'm not sure it's a good solution.

For your last (good) suggestion I need to test it before the definitive implementation. I have noticed that preset recall is actually very slow and I'm not sure of the consequences of such implementation.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 26 Jul 2007, 15:42

]]> 2007-07-26T15:11:40+02:00 2007-07-26T15:11:40+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2445#p2445 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> Statistics: Posted by bsork — 26 Jul 2007, 15:11

]]> 2007-07-25T19:15:00+02:00 2007-07-25T19:15:00+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2442#p2442 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> An alternative : add an inlet on sub-patches to show patches controls.

Statistics: Posted by moody33 — 25 Jul 2007, 19:15

]]> 2007-07-25T09:39:52+02:00 2007-07-25T09:39:52+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2438#p2438 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> I can add an inlet, no problem.
But don't forget, setting visible on/off for a control can cost a lot in term of CPU. Because Usine has to redraw the control panel, and move remaining controls...

Statistics: Posted by senso — 25 Jul 2007, 09:39

]]> 2007-07-24T02:37:15+02:00 2007-07-24T02:37:15+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2434#p2434 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
With that parameter open for manipulation on more modules, especially the interface builder could be more flexible, with only the relevant faders etc showing at any given time, much like the sequencer live mode. One could even create some karaoke-like text output - handy if you keep forgetting the lyrics or chords...

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 24 Jul 2007, 02:37

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/512 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 2007-07-28T13:02:35+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2458#p2458 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
Please keep Usine stable and quick... there must be a lightest solution.
I second that.

Statistics: Posted by moody33 — 28 Jul 2007, 13:02

]]> 2007-07-28T10:18:43+02:00 2007-07-28T10:18:43+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2455#p2455 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
I can't really say I've noticed that recalling presets is slow, and I've been testing with the modules that have the inlet - like the array, step etc. All of them I assume more complex to create/destroy than a simple fader or button.

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 28 Jul 2007, 10:18

]]> 2007-07-26T17:42:03+02:00 2007-07-26T17:42:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2447#p2447 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> Statistics: Posted by stanlea — 26 Jul 2007, 17:42

]]> 2007-07-26T15:42:33+02:00 2007-07-26T15:42:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2446#p2446 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> I'm not sure it's a good solution.

For your last (good) suggestion I need to test it before the definitive implementation. I have noticed that preset recall is actually very slow and I'm not sure of the consequences of such implementation.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 26 Jul 2007, 15:42

]]> 2007-07-26T15:11:40+02:00 2007-07-26T15:11:40+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2445#p2445 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> Statistics: Posted by bsork — 26 Jul 2007, 15:11

]]> 2007-07-25T19:15:00+02:00 2007-07-25T19:15:00+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2442#p2442 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> An alternative : add an inlet on sub-patches to show patches controls.

Statistics: Posted by moody33 — 25 Jul 2007, 19:15

]]> 2007-07-25T09:39:52+02:00 2007-07-25T09:39:52+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2438#p2438 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]> I can add an inlet, no problem.
But don't forget, setting visible on/off for a control can cost a lot in term of CPU. Because Usine has to redraw the control panel, and move remaining controls...

Statistics: Posted by senso — 25 Jul 2007, 09:39

]]> 2007-07-24T02:37:15+02:00 2007-07-24T02:37:15+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=512&p=2434#p2434 <![CDATA[Input for visible parameter]]>
With that parameter open for manipulation on more modules, especially the interface builder could be more flexible, with only the relevant faders etc showing at any given time, much like the sequencer live mode. One could even create some karaoke-like text output - handy if you keep forgetting the lyrics or chords...

Statistics: Posted by bsork — 24 Jul 2007, 02:37

]]>