]]>
]]>
You cannot approach Hollyhock like a DAW, because it isn't.
Hollyhock essentially is like a DAW instrument, and question is correct that many aspects of the GUI is in how you design.
In comparison to most DAW or audio utilities Hollyhock brings all the good elements with extreme flexibility and customization.
I wouldn't be surprised if more is to come in GUI customization.
-S
Statistics: Posted by sephult — 24 Mar 2015, 19:42
]]>
]]>
]]>
And Hollyhock... the user interface drives me nuts, and everything else is MUSICAL.
Max has a huge ego and Hollyhock is more about making music somehow. I get results with Hollyhock. I get a headache with Max.
Thanks for the tip on floating windows...it helps
When is Hollyhock 2 coming out?
Statistics: Posted by osha — 15 Jan 2015, 17:59
]]>
And I miss contextual menus. An option to put the context menu (it IS a context menu after all) under a right-click, command-click or long click would preserve cross-platform compatibility, and still have the menu appear when needed and disappear the rest of the time.
I think HH would be a ton easier to work with on a large dual-screen setup, but all I have is a laptop
Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 15 Jan 2015, 17:43
]]>
]]>
I'm struggling with aspects of the current one on a 13' screen. I can see how it might work on a big screen but I'm struggling on my Macbook Pro. And the contextual menu system takes a lot of getting used to. And the colours seem like they could do with a makeover. Sorry but it's how I feel, most other aspects I like a lot!
Also is all that information necessary all of the time. Seems like the lack of menus is driving a mass of on screen information. If the IB worked a little more intuitively then I could understand it but patches are either one place or the other not both, so it gets really really confusing......
Statistics: Posted by osha — 15 Jan 2015, 01:53
]]>