ArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/4597 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30715#p30715 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]>
The way I do it is I send the patch itself to the IB and it ends up being a sort of a container for the interface while allowing me to dive into patching windows without going back to rack view.

I think it's a nice way to design the patch and the performance interface side by side.

Also when you send the patch there you can still modulate the parameters in the grid, whereas when you send individual control elements or containers they don't appear in the list.

Statistics: Posted by Tackla — 16 Nov 2014, 10:32


]]>
2014-11-16T11:21:45+02:00 2014-11-16T11:21:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30714#p30714 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]> Statistics: Posted by XpiR — 16 Nov 2014, 10:21


]]>
2014-11-16T03:11:57+02:00 2014-11-16T03:11:57+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30712#p30712 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]>
One thing I thought of is the IB is useful when laying out the patch, as when you unlock the elements in the rack view all racks become moveable and bleed through the patch window, possibly the IB is what it says....Interface Builder to make it easier to modify?

-S

Statistics: Posted by sephult — 16 Nov 2014, 02:11


]]>
2014-11-16T01:26:02+02:00 2014-11-16T01:26:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30711#p30711 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]> This makes a bit difficult to work back on a patch as the modules in the IB are not visible in the control panel.
I would use the IB if the IB modules could remain in the control panel too...

Statistics: Posted by XpiR — 16 Nov 2014, 00:26


]]>
BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/4597 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 2014-11-16T11:32:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30715#p30715 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]>
The way I do it is I send the patch itself to the IB and it ends up being a sort of a container for the interface while allowing me to dive into patching windows without going back to rack view.

I think it's a nice way to design the patch and the performance interface side by side.

Also when you send the patch there you can still modulate the parameters in the grid, whereas when you send individual control elements or containers they don't appear in the list.

Statistics: Posted by Tackla — 16 Nov 2014, 10:32


]]>
2014-11-16T11:21:45+02:00 2014-11-16T11:21:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30714#p30714 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]> Statistics: Posted by XpiR — 16 Nov 2014, 10:21


]]>
2014-11-16T03:11:57+02:00 2014-11-16T03:11:57+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30712#p30712 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]>
One thing I thought of is the IB is useful when laying out the patch, as when you unlock the elements in the rack view all racks become moveable and bleed through the patch window, possibly the IB is what it says....Interface Builder to make it easier to modify?

-S

Statistics: Posted by sephult — 16 Nov 2014, 02:11


]]>
2014-11-16T01:26:02+02:00 2014-11-16T01:26:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4597&p=30711#p30711 <![CDATA[interface builder vs control panel]]> This makes a bit difficult to work back on a patch as the modules in the IB are not visible in the control panel.
I would use the IB if the IB modules could remain in the control panel too...

Statistics: Posted by XpiR — 16 Nov 2014, 00:26


]]>