]]>
Why ?
- because I'm using different speaker configuration and for now I need one patch for each config. with those arrays I could set different speaker config from one patch.
- because I could set speaker angle more efficently than by hand
- because I'm planning to have moving speakers !
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 22 Nov 2014, 13:26
]]>
works fine but the speaker location should be locked otherwise the speaker position resets as you operate the switch...
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 03 Jul 2014, 23:14
]]>
It could by hidden when positionning the speakers and shown if we need to set the area parameter ?
So it could have the right size and be an aid when setting the area ?
Statistics: Posted by jean-marc duchenne — 02 Jul 2014, 11:20
]]>
]]>
It's choice because I realize that with big speakers it was hard to change their positions with an acceptable precision.
Statistics: Posted by senso — 29 Jun 2014, 14:28
]]>
But I will be happy to see improvements on the surround panner. It will be good for Usiners.
Statistics: Posted by jean-marc duchenne — 16 Jun 2014, 17:29
]]>
that's what I noticed now that I experimented in depth with the surround panner !
Still I'd like to be able to have a control over the speaker position.
I did quite a lot of experimements with the quadratic distance module (that allows the speakers position to be controlled) the goal being to have the space dimension of music becoming as expressive as possible in realtime !
Didnt know you were a Holyhock user : great !
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 15 Jun 2014, 20:41
]]>
A better representation would be either NO view at all (only the value), or, of course, an accurate view...
Statistics: Posted by jean-marc duchenne — 15 Jun 2014, 16:39
]]>
cheers
olivar
Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 09 Jun 2014, 14:16
]]>