ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/3937 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27235#p27235 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> thank you.
Joffo

Statistics: Posted by joffo78 — 16 Jul 2013, 00:28

]]> 2013-07-15T22:54:25+02:00 2013-07-15T22:54:25+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27234#p27234 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> there was a new answer from Joffo who makes the comparison between
2 identical patchs one with Hollyhock and the same with Usine
that proved that Hollyhock was in "CPU overload" and usine 2%
for the same patch but curiously there were no conclusions to this post
this was disproportionate and when i saw the hour when the answer was writing
i see that it was posted at 7h58 am it's not possible so think that it was a spam
but i went to the uploader and i've noticed that the picture of this false post
remains in the uploader it can be misleading
good evening
;)

Statistics: Posted by waolelaid — 15 Jul 2013, 22:54

]]> 2013-07-09T15:21:22+02:00 2013-07-09T15:21:22+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27134#p27134 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> Time enslaves my ears ! Time is order ! Once sounds are arrange in time based schemes, the essence of sound is gone.
Very few software can allow me to to what I need to do : Max or pure data could do, but the learning curve is not really for the spontaneous inclined.
Usine is the best choice I know for "simplexity" : easy to get into it, instant gratification with the VST integration and endless possibilities for the one who is willing to dig deeper : OSC, scripting language, SDK...
For me, Usine is capable of running a huge 30Mo patch that I can play with for 5 hours in a row without one crack ! Just playing music, not with a computer !
And last but not least : just try to ask a new feature with the Live developpement team and you'll know that Sensomusic is a developpment dreamteam !
My two cents.

Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 09 Jul 2013, 15:21

]]> 2013-07-09T08:33:03+02:00 2013-07-09T08:33:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27130#p27130 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> about the script, a new script engine , at least 5 X faster will be included in next version :)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 09 Jul 2013, 08:33

]]> 2013-07-09T07:09:34+02:00 2013-07-09T07:09:34+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27128#p27128 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]>
my summary of experience so far is that hollyhock is worth It. It is a big improvement in many ways. The more I try the grid the more satisfied and excited I become. Thanks team!

Statistics: Posted by seamus — 09 Jul 2013, 07:09

]]> 2013-07-02T22:57:04+02:00 2013-07-02T22:57:04+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27073#p27073 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]>
So far i find that i get much better cpu performance out of usine 5.80. Although hollyhock has many improvements for me that are crucial so i am trying to find ways to work in the new world of hollyhock.

I am going to get a hot new laptop with raging fast specs so hopefully this will solve my cpu issues with hollyhock. I could also be doing something wrong. If usine 5.80 seems to run fine then Hollyhock must be more greedy for cpu power.

Im currently on a I7 macbook pro bootcamp windows 7. 2.3 ghz sandybridge. hoolyhock 64bit. latency of 64samples. with the processor of hollyhock at about 30% i hear crackles.

Statistics: Posted by seamus — 02 Jul 2013, 22:57

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/3937 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 2013-07-16T00:28:33+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27235#p27235 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> thank you.
Joffo

Statistics: Posted by joffo78 — 16 Jul 2013, 00:28

]]> 2013-07-15T22:54:25+02:00 2013-07-15T22:54:25+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27234#p27234 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> there was a new answer from Joffo who makes the comparison between
2 identical patchs one with Hollyhock and the same with Usine
that proved that Hollyhock was in "CPU overload" and usine 2%
for the same patch but curiously there were no conclusions to this post
this was disproportionate and when i saw the hour when the answer was writing
i see that it was posted at 7h58 am it's not possible so think that it was a spam
but i went to the uploader and i've noticed that the picture of this false post
remains in the uploader it can be misleading
good evening
;)

Statistics: Posted by waolelaid — 15 Jul 2013, 22:54

]]> 2013-07-09T15:21:22+02:00 2013-07-09T15:21:22+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27134#p27134 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> Time enslaves my ears ! Time is order ! Once sounds are arrange in time based schemes, the essence of sound is gone.
Very few software can allow me to to what I need to do : Max or pure data could do, but the learning curve is not really for the spontaneous inclined.
Usine is the best choice I know for "simplexity" : easy to get into it, instant gratification with the VST integration and endless possibilities for the one who is willing to dig deeper : OSC, scripting language, SDK...
For me, Usine is capable of running a huge 30Mo patch that I can play with for 5 hours in a row without one crack ! Just playing music, not with a computer !
And last but not least : just try to ask a new feature with the Live developpement team and you'll know that Sensomusic is a developpment dreamteam !
My two cents.

Statistics: Posted by oli_lab — 09 Jul 2013, 15:21

]]> 2013-07-09T08:33:03+02:00 2013-07-09T08:33:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27130#p27130 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]> about the script, a new script engine , at least 5 X faster will be included in next version :)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 09 Jul 2013, 08:33

]]> 2013-07-09T07:09:34+02:00 2013-07-09T07:09:34+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27128#p27128 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]>
my summary of experience so far is that hollyhock is worth It. It is a big improvement in many ways. The more I try the grid the more satisfied and excited I become. Thanks team!

Statistics: Posted by seamus — 09 Jul 2013, 07:09

]]> 2013-07-02T22:57:04+02:00 2013-07-02T22:57:04+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3937&p=27073#p27073 <![CDATA[hollyhock vs usine 5.80]]>
So far i find that i get much better cpu performance out of usine 5.80. Although hollyhock has many improvements for me that are crucial so i am trying to find ways to work in the new world of hollyhock.

I am going to get a hot new laptop with raging fast specs so hopefully this will solve my cpu issues with hollyhock. I could also be doing something wrong. If usine 5.80 seems to run fine then Hollyhock must be more greedy for cpu power.

Im currently on a I7 macbook pro bootcamp windows 7. 2.3 ghz sandybridge. hoolyhock 64bit. latency of 64samples. with the processor of hollyhock at about 30% i hear crackles.

Statistics: Posted by seamus — 02 Jul 2013, 22:57

]]>