]]>
finaly i've made this clock like this:
www.sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.php?f ... Clock0.pat
using local sync with calculated proper tempo and step module.
now synchro is perfect.
Statistics: Posted by nelson — 08 Oct 2012, 13:32
]]>
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 05 Oct 2012, 15:26
]]>
Your patch works perfectly but my case is to make a clock that can "tick" little bit strange patterns like "21, 34, 21, 34" ... its hard to do that with SeqSwitch modules - pattern is generated with some algorithm and can have different length (but sum of all elements is constant for all of them so rythm should be in synchro)
check this out:
http://sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.ph ... clock2.wkp
i've made as a patch not script.
please tell me there is any solution
Statistics: Posted by nelson — 05 Oct 2012, 14:23
]]>
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 05 Oct 2012, 11:12
]]>
here is workspace http://www.sensomusic.com/forums/upload ... k-test.wkp ,
i've made this clock with script (easier) .... but its still dont synchronize.
elapsed time modules measures sequence duration. sequence with more array elements takes more time
Statistics: Posted by nelson — 05 Oct 2012, 00:42
]]>
Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 04 Oct 2012, 23:49
]]>
input:
1. base interval (for example: 100ms)
2. pattern array (for example: 2, 2, 4,
output:
clock "tick" multiplicating base interval according to pattern array - for ex. 200ms from start, then next 200ms, then 400ms, then 800ms ...
easy.
problem is to synchronize 2 patches like that and I dont know why.
for example:
array1 is 2,2,4,8
array2 is 2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2
sum of both = 16 so both clocks should synchronise after 1600ms ...BUT they never do
longer array takes more time. I think its a events processing time ...
HOW to make it in proper way?
Statistics: Posted by nelson — 04 Oct 2012, 21:10
]]>