ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2487 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16314#p16314 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]>
If you're looking for a very low latency transfer with buses, disable the multi-cpu option in the setup.
In mono CPU mode there is no latency if you send data from track N to Track M if M>N. Otherwise the latency is 1 Bloc.
this works perfectly. thanks a lot for the info.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 20:30

]]> 2010-10-11T18:13:26+02:00 2010-10-11T18:13:26+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16302#p16302 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> In mono CPU mode there is no latency if you send data from track N to Track M if M>N. Otherwise the latency is 1 Bloc.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Oct 2010, 18:13

]]> 2010-10-11T10:17:50+02:00 2010-10-11T10:17:50+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16295#p16295 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by bsork — 11 Oct 2010, 10:17

]]> 2010-10-11T09:37:38+02:00 2010-10-11T09:37:38+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16293#p16293 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 09:37

]]> 2010-10-11T09:35:52+02:00 2010-10-11T09:35:52+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16292#p16292 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Oct 2010, 09:35

]]> 2010-10-11T09:23:51+02:00 2010-10-11T09:23:51+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16291#p16291 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 11 Oct 2010, 09:23

]]> 2010-10-11T09:14:55+02:00 2010-10-11T09:14:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16289#p16289 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 09:14

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2487 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 2010-10-11T20:30:13+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16314#p16314 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]>
If you're looking for a very low latency transfer with buses, disable the multi-cpu option in the setup.
In mono CPU mode there is no latency if you send data from track N to Track M if M>N. Otherwise the latency is 1 Bloc.
this works perfectly. thanks a lot for the info.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 20:30

]]> 2010-10-11T18:13:26+02:00 2010-10-11T18:13:26+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16302#p16302 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> In mono CPU mode there is no latency if you send data from track N to Track M if M>N. Otherwise the latency is 1 Bloc.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Oct 2010, 18:13

]]> 2010-10-11T10:17:50+02:00 2010-10-11T10:17:50+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16295#p16295 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by bsork — 11 Oct 2010, 10:17

]]> 2010-10-11T09:37:38+02:00 2010-10-11T09:37:38+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16293#p16293 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 09:37

]]> 2010-10-11T09:35:52+02:00 2010-10-11T09:35:52+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16292#p16292 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Oct 2010, 09:35

]]> 2010-10-11T09:23:51+02:00 2010-10-11T09:23:51+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16291#p16291 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 11 Oct 2010, 09:23

]]> 2010-10-11T09:14:55+02:00 2010-10-11T09:14:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2487&p=16289#p16289 <![CDATA[crosstrack patching?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 11 Oct 2010, 09:14

]]>