ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2138 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13683#p13683 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 17:10


]]>
2010-04-28T17:01:48+02:00 2010-04-28T17:01:48+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13682#p13682 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> :)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 28 Apr 2010, 17:01


]]>
2010-04-28T16:23:44+02:00 2010-04-28T16:23:44+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13678#p13678 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> imagine the possibilities. thanks for the help.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Apr 2010, 16:23


]]>
2010-04-28T15:34:50+02:00 2010-04-28T15:34:50+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13675#p13675 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>

http://sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.ph ... o%2001.wkp

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 15:34


]]>
2010-04-28T14:52:43+02:00 2010-04-28T14:52:43+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13673#p13673 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>
basically can choose a precision factor from bar to 1/256th, and it returns all tempi that will fit the bloc matrix, linked to usine running blocsize.
if choosing in the list the bpm closest to our usual Bpm should theorically higly reduce/bypass the problem, maybe if some could try and report.. at least here my tests return much stable results-see no drift whereas any other tempo does.

lower blocsize and precision are, higher number of tempi choices and vice_versa.

http://sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.ph ... po%20c.wkp

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 14:52


]]>
2010-04-28T13:48:20+02:00 2010-04-28T13:48:20+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13671#p13671 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> i also know an other example where the guy record 2 second of sample , play in loop mode = ok , then record again,but 5 second for example , and this time , not always , the play don't begin correctly at the start of the sample
i think it's the same kind of situation..

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 28 Apr 2010, 13:48


]]>
2010-04-28T12:21:30+02:00 2010-04-28T12:21:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13669#p13669 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> well it can sound frustrating and strange, but im quite sure this is related to the numeric bloc world.

Sampler rec lenght can change cause of the bloc size pb we saw before, the REC being activated/desactivated on a bloc clock.
As related to some tempi, some trigger lenght won't fit an integer nb of blocs, especially with large bloc size, so at some point a roundind in time occurs, and can change the lenght. if you try @ 161.50 bpm, the clock will be never drifting for exemple.
so solutions to get lowest possible drift is to have lowest possible blocsize, combined with a fine tuning tempo.
in any case triggerz are always related to bloc size and master tempo, so im affraid it's a natural limitation that can't be solved/bypassed, execpt this way.

but if you can be in a 32 bloc size there is certainly a 'magical' tempo really close to yours that should fix the pb.
will look if i find back my 'fiting the matrix tempo' calculator...

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 12:21


]]>
2010-04-28T07:14:02+02:00 2010-04-28T07:14:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13660#p13660 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 28 Apr 2010, 07:14


]]>
2010-04-28T03:57:42+02:00 2010-04-28T03:57:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13659#p13659 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Apr 2010, 03:57


]]>
2010-04-14T06:03:59+02:00 2010-04-14T06:03:59+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13393#p13393 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 14 Apr 2010, 06:03


]]>
BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2138 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 2010-04-28T17:10:03+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13683#p13683 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 17:10


]]>
2010-04-28T17:01:48+02:00 2010-04-28T17:01:48+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13682#p13682 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> :)

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 28 Apr 2010, 17:01


]]>
2010-04-28T16:23:44+02:00 2010-04-28T16:23:44+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13678#p13678 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> imagine the possibilities. thanks for the help.

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Apr 2010, 16:23


]]>
2010-04-28T15:34:50+02:00 2010-04-28T15:34:50+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13675#p13675 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>

http://sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.ph ... o%2001.wkp

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 15:34


]]>
2010-04-28T14:52:43+02:00 2010-04-28T14:52:43+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13673#p13673 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>
basically can choose a precision factor from bar to 1/256th, and it returns all tempi that will fit the bloc matrix, linked to usine running blocsize.
if choosing in the list the bpm closest to our usual Bpm should theorically higly reduce/bypass the problem, maybe if some could try and report.. at least here my tests return much stable results-see no drift whereas any other tempo does.

lower blocsize and precision are, higher number of tempi choices and vice_versa.

http://sensomusic.com/forums/uploads.ph ... po%20c.wkp

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 14:52


]]>
2010-04-28T13:48:20+02:00 2010-04-28T13:48:20+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13671#p13671 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> i also know an other example where the guy record 2 second of sample , play in loop mode = ok , then record again,but 5 second for example , and this time , not always , the play don't begin correctly at the start of the sample
i think it's the same kind of situation..

Statistics: Posted by nay-seven — 28 Apr 2010, 13:48


]]>
2010-04-28T12:21:30+02:00 2010-04-28T12:21:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13669#p13669 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> well it can sound frustrating and strange, but im quite sure this is related to the numeric bloc world.

Sampler rec lenght can change cause of the bloc size pb we saw before, the REC being activated/desactivated on a bloc clock.
As related to some tempi, some trigger lenght won't fit an integer nb of blocs, especially with large bloc size, so at some point a roundind in time occurs, and can change the lenght. if you try @ 161.50 bpm, the clock will be never drifting for exemple.
so solutions to get lowest possible drift is to have lowest possible blocsize, combined with a fine tuning tempo.
in any case triggerz are always related to bloc size and master tempo, so im affraid it's a natural limitation that can't be solved/bypassed, execpt this way.

but if you can be in a 32 bloc size there is certainly a 'magical' tempo really close to yours that should fix the pb.
will look if i find back my 'fiting the matrix tempo' calculator...

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 28 Apr 2010, 12:21


]]>
2010-04-28T07:14:02+02:00 2010-04-28T07:14:02+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13660#p13660 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 28 Apr 2010, 07:14


]]>
2010-04-28T03:57:42+02:00 2010-04-28T03:57:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13659#p13659 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]>

Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 28 Apr 2010, 03:57


]]>
2010-04-14T06:03:59+02:00 2010-04-14T06:03:59+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2138&p=13393#p13393 <![CDATA[sampler as buffer/stutter effect?]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 14 Apr 2010, 06:03


]]>