ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2086 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13068#p13068 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
The EQ I'm using for now is BootEQmkII ( http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/200 ... ease-info/ )
I'm not so much using it because I can say whether I like the sound of the EQ or not, but it's free and the controls are convenient for my patch. It uses a lot of memory for 16 instances so I should probably find something lighter to use...

Edit:
Solo example is now in addons section...

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 30 Mar 2010, 20:47

]]> 2010-03-30T09:48:45+02:00 2010-03-30T09:48:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13045#p13045 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Have you thought about analyzing a mixer block diagram ? If they do it electricaly I don't see why it should not be possible to reproduce it with Usine. An example here : http://www.mackie.com/products/1604vlz3 ... LZ3_OM.pdf, page 34
About the Eq : I've looked for one and tested a lot, from free to very expensive (trial of course ;)), and I haven't found free plugins that convinced me... I must say that I was trying to replace my Avalon 737 so it's quite unfair ! The best thing to do is to dive into to choose your own according to your tastes... and what about adding a High pass ?

Statistics: Posted by La Tenaille — 30 Mar 2010, 09:48

]]> 2010-03-30T05:38:42+02:00 2010-03-30T05:38:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13039#p13039 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Now I can solo individual tracks but un-soloing tracks still doesn't work properly. I'll attach my patch in case anyone gets inspired for a silly challenge. You need at least 3 tracks to test properly...
http://www.sensomusic.com/forums/upload ... -Solo2.pat

Image

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 30 Mar 2010, 05:38

]]> 2010-03-29T12:45:10+02:00 2010-03-29T12:45:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13023#p13023 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
seems a very cool mixer! mmm no sugg for EQ, i like sonalksis3, but they are not free..i think this is a question for amiga909, the vst bible ;)

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 29 Mar 2010, 12:45

]]> 2010-03-29T12:14:53+02:00 2010-03-29T12:14:53+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13020#p13020 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> I'll try it like that, but without the patch in front of me, I seem to think the combination mute / solo wasn't really my problem because even if I don't use the mute I have the same problem...I think I also tried a Has Changed module in place of the lower B=1 module to stop the solo switch from affecting the current patch via the solo receive bus, but that didn't help at all, as I recall. I'll check again in the morning.

I'm pretty sure same name send data buses is not working, maybe in the next beta?

anyways, now I have cue and 4 sends instead of 3. Is 16 stereo / mono chanels, 4 submixes with xfade + return channels for each send enough? :)
Also, any suggestions for a lightweight good sounding vst eq?(free) I like the one I am using now but it is a bit heavy on memory.

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 29 Mar 2010, 12:14

]]> 2010-03-29T11:19:55+02:00 2010-03-29T11:19:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13018#p13018 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
relating to your problem, i dont catch why solo and mute should be somehow linked, what is the reason you don't controls 20x mutes and 20x solos in a separate way? by default you can solo multiple tracks no? i must miss something, forgive me..

note sending to audio buss use more Cpu than sending to a data bus, as it sends 256 values vs 1 if your bloc size is ie 256., this X20 could have a noticable difference. can't we use same datasend bus name if they are in a different subpatch? i don't rememer..
if then i would make a simple data out of subpatchs 'solo", all going to a single solo send bus maybe..

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 29 Mar 2010, 11:19

]]> 2010-03-29T10:59:45+02:00 2010-03-29T10:59:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13014#p13014 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 29 Mar 2010, 10:59

]]> 2010-03-29T08:48:15+02:00 2010-03-29T08:48:15+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13012#p13012 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> What I have so far is the abiility to solo on any one one track, and if I toggle solo on, off and on again on another track I can solo multiple tracks, but I need it to work the first time I engage the solo switch.
Also working how I want it at this point is that the original mute state of a track is unaffected by solo...

Here's what I have (the send bus is audio because multiple data send buses cannot have the same name, and this seems to work ok...?)
Image

Here's a sneakpeak at what you would be helping me make.. (not that there is Anything at all wrong with the normal Usine mixer but I think this looks better and uses more cpu too :) )
Image

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 29 Mar 2010, 08:48

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/2086 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 2010-03-30T20:47:05+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13068#p13068 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
The EQ I'm using for now is BootEQmkII ( http://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/200 ... ease-info/ )
I'm not so much using it because I can say whether I like the sound of the EQ or not, but it's free and the controls are convenient for my patch. It uses a lot of memory for 16 instances so I should probably find something lighter to use...

Edit:
Solo example is now in addons section...

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 30 Mar 2010, 20:47

]]> 2010-03-30T09:48:45+02:00 2010-03-30T09:48:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13045#p13045 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Have you thought about analyzing a mixer block diagram ? If they do it electricaly I don't see why it should not be possible to reproduce it with Usine. An example here : http://www.mackie.com/products/1604vlz3 ... LZ3_OM.pdf, page 34
About the Eq : I've looked for one and tested a lot, from free to very expensive (trial of course ;)), and I haven't found free plugins that convinced me... I must say that I was trying to replace my Avalon 737 so it's quite unfair ! The best thing to do is to dive into to choose your own according to your tastes... and what about adding a High pass ?

Statistics: Posted by La Tenaille — 30 Mar 2010, 09:48

]]> 2010-03-30T05:38:42+02:00 2010-03-30T05:38:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13039#p13039 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Now I can solo individual tracks but un-soloing tracks still doesn't work properly. I'll attach my patch in case anyone gets inspired for a silly challenge. You need at least 3 tracks to test properly...
http://www.sensomusic.com/forums/upload ... -Solo2.pat

Image

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 30 Mar 2010, 05:38

]]> 2010-03-29T12:45:10+02:00 2010-03-29T12:45:10+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13023#p13023 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
seems a very cool mixer! mmm no sugg for EQ, i like sonalksis3, but they are not free..i think this is a question for amiga909, the vst bible ;)

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 29 Mar 2010, 12:45

]]> 2010-03-29T12:14:53+02:00 2010-03-29T12:14:53+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13020#p13020 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> I'll try it like that, but without the patch in front of me, I seem to think the combination mute / solo wasn't really my problem because even if I don't use the mute I have the same problem...I think I also tried a Has Changed module in place of the lower B=1 module to stop the solo switch from affecting the current patch via the solo receive bus, but that didn't help at all, as I recall. I'll check again in the morning.

I'm pretty sure same name send data buses is not working, maybe in the next beta?

anyways, now I have cue and 4 sends instead of 3. Is 16 stereo / mono chanels, 4 submixes with xfade + return channels for each send enough? :)
Also, any suggestions for a lightweight good sounding vst eq?(free) I like the one I am using now but it is a bit heavy on memory.

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 29 Mar 2010, 12:14

]]> 2010-03-29T11:19:55+02:00 2010-03-29T11:19:55+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13018#p13018 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]>
relating to your problem, i dont catch why solo and mute should be somehow linked, what is the reason you don't controls 20x mutes and 20x solos in a separate way? by default you can solo multiple tracks no? i must miss something, forgive me..

note sending to audio buss use more Cpu than sending to a data bus, as it sends 256 values vs 1 if your bloc size is ie 256., this X20 could have a noticable difference. can't we use same datasend bus name if they are in a different subpatch? i don't rememer..
if then i would make a simple data out of subpatchs 'solo", all going to a single solo send bus maybe..

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 29 Mar 2010, 11:19

]]> 2010-03-29T10:59:45+02:00 2010-03-29T10:59:45+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13014#p13014 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> Statistics: Posted by soundmind — 29 Mar 2010, 10:59

]]> 2010-03-29T08:48:15+02:00 2010-03-29T08:48:15+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2086&p=13012#p13012 <![CDATA[mute / solo circuit]]> What I have so far is the abiility to solo on any one one track, and if I toggle solo on, off and on again on another track I can solo multiple tracks, but I need it to work the first time I engage the solo switch.
Also working how I want it at this point is that the original mute state of a track is unaffected by solo...

Here's what I have (the send bus is audio because multiple data send buses cannot have the same name, and this seems to work ok...?)
Image

Here's a sneakpeak at what you would be helping me make.. (not that there is Anything at all wrong with the normal Usine mixer but I think this looks better and uses more cpu too :) )
Image

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 29 Mar 2010, 08:48

]]>