ArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/1565 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=9027#p9027 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]> Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 25 May 2009, 03:48

]]> 2009-05-23T11:21:42+02:00 2009-05-23T11:21:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=8967#p8967 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]> the last 'send to buse' module rewrite (cancel) previous values.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 23 May 2009, 11:21

]]> 2009-05-18T18:26:24+02:00 2009-05-18T18:26:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=8875#p8875 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]>
I think I've mentioned this before, but II note that the following patch does not work:

patch 1
audioSource1 --> fxSend_level --> send to buss_1
patch 2
audioSource2 --> fxSend_level -->send to buss_1
patch 3
receive from buss_1 --> audioEffect

only one of the sources is received at the buss destination. Is there a necessity for this behaviour? I just want be able to use a buss as an fx send.

I can patch this way:

patch 1
audioSource1 --> fxSend_level --> send to buss_1A
patch 2
audioSource2 --> fxSend_level -->send to buss_1B
patch 3
receive from buss_1A --> audioEffect
receive from buss_1B --> audioEffect

But it's going to create a huge number more modules. I was using a combo to dynamically reassign the buss send, and that works great, but only for one channel at a time!

Just wondering why this is not supported, and whether it will change in future (or maybe it's actually a bug?) before I start creating all those wires. I thought the bussing would make creation of a matrix mixer really transparent, but it's not so true with the current behaviour.

It's so helpful that Usine automatically mixes cables. It makes sense that busses would work the same way.....

Thanks,
-eric

Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 18 May 2009, 18:26

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/1565 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 2009-05-25T03:48:29+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=9027#p9027 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]> Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 25 May 2009, 03:48

]]> 2009-05-23T11:21:42+02:00 2009-05-23T11:21:42+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=8967#p8967 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]> the last 'send to buse' module rewrite (cancel) previous values.

Statistics: Posted by senso — 23 May 2009, 11:21

]]> 2009-05-18T18:26:24+02:00 2009-05-18T18:26:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1565&p=8875#p8875 <![CDATA[mixing busses]]>
I think I've mentioned this before, but II note that the following patch does not work:

patch 1
audioSource1 --> fxSend_level --> send to buss_1
patch 2
audioSource2 --> fxSend_level -->send to buss_1
patch 3
receive from buss_1 --> audioEffect

only one of the sources is received at the buss destination. Is there a necessity for this behaviour? I just want be able to use a buss as an fx send.

I can patch this way:

patch 1
audioSource1 --> fxSend_level --> send to buss_1A
patch 2
audioSource2 --> fxSend_level -->send to buss_1B
patch 3
receive from buss_1A --> audioEffect
receive from buss_1B --> audioEffect

But it's going to create a huge number more modules. I was using a combo to dynamically reassign the buss send, and that works great, but only for one channel at a time!

Just wondering why this is not supported, and whether it will change in future (or maybe it's actually a bug?) before I start creating all those wires. I thought the bussing would make creation of a matrix mixer really transparent, but it's not so true with the current behaviour.

It's so helpful that Usine automatically mixes cables. It makes sense that busses would work the same way.....

Thanks,
-eric

Statistics: Posted by woodslanding — 18 May 2009, 18:26

]]>