ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/1491 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8838#p8838 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
Start > Run > msconfig
Services tab > Hide all Microsoft services > Uncheck everything you don't want/need
Startup tab > Uncheck everything you don't need

Just my two cents, it might help someone

Statistics: Posted by 80skeys — 15 May 2009, 23:15

]]> 2009-04-25T18:27:08+02:00 2009-04-25T18:27:08+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8409#p8409 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 25 Apr 2009, 18:27

]]> 2009-04-25T17:27:24+02:00 2009-04-25T17:27:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8408#p8408 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 25 Apr 2009, 17:27

]]> 2009-04-25T12:11:22+02:00 2009-04-25T12:11:22+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8406#p8406 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
I have the same result on my TX2Z...

I think it's the AMD processor...(and my fan sound like an airplane! very scary sometimes ahahah)

Anyway , i can run Usine ,Ableton 7(with a lot of reaktor5 hungry plug) and Audiocubes software quite well (sometime some slow touch...)

Statistics: Posted by fractal — 25 Apr 2009, 12:11

]]> 2009-04-25T00:05:44+02:00 2009-04-25T00:05:44+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8396#p8396 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 25 Apr 2009, 00:05

]]> 2009-04-24T23:00:34+02:00 2009-04-24T23:00:34+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8395#p8395 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
4.2 demo gives me 30;40 cpu average in 512ms asio4all on dual 2.33, saddly didn't check before on XP.. quite high also..

edit: on ableton live results seems same between Xp and W7, had a liveset at 50 percent still the same.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 24 Apr 2009, 23:00

]]> 2009-04-24T19:29:31+02:00 2009-04-24T19:29:31+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8394#p8394 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
seems disapointing results, sad truely nice otherwise, I hesitated to buy one, I finally got back a cheap layer for mbp 15"..

edit : arf and im just about to install W7 beta...mmmm

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 24 Apr 2009, 19:29

]]> 2009-04-24T18:54:56+02:00 2009-04-24T18:54:56+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8393#p8393 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> The default workspace that loads with Usine (4.2 beta8),running uses between 45-55% of the dual core AMD QL-62 2Ghz cpu with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting.

The same default workspace loaded and running on my intel core 2 quad core 3.5Ghz desktop with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting (for comparison sake I am not using 4 threads) uses 1-2% ! (x2 = 2-4% of two cores)
Lets say that my desktop is 3x faster than the tx2500 while using only two cores, that should still only amount to 12% or maybe even 15- 20% cpu running the same workspace on the tablet, but 45-55%?

Both computers are using the same audio hardware, PCI Express/Expresscard > RME Multiface II set at a 256 sample buffer.
The desktop is running Windows XP 64-bit, the tablet is running Windows 7 evaluation/beta.

Could this big of a performance gap be because of Windows 7, or are the AMD cpu's really not very efficient?
I assume there are at least several of these tablets in use around here. What results are you getting?

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 24 Apr 2009, 18:54

]]> BrainModular BrainModular Users Forum 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/1491 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 2009-05-15T23:15:30+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8838#p8838 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
Start > Run > msconfig
Services tab > Hide all Microsoft services > Uncheck everything you don't want/need
Startup tab > Uncheck everything you don't need

Just my two cents, it might help someone

Statistics: Posted by 80skeys — 15 May 2009, 23:15

]]> 2009-04-25T18:27:08+02:00 2009-04-25T18:27:08+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8409#p8409 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 25 Apr 2009, 18:27

]]> 2009-04-25T17:27:24+02:00 2009-04-25T17:27:24+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8408#p8408 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 25 Apr 2009, 17:27

]]> 2009-04-25T12:11:22+02:00 2009-04-25T12:11:22+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8406#p8406 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
I have the same result on my TX2Z...

I think it's the AMD processor...(and my fan sound like an airplane! very scary sometimes ahahah)

Anyway , i can run Usine ,Ableton 7(with a lot of reaktor5 hungry plug) and Audiocubes software quite well (sometime some slow touch...)

Statistics: Posted by fractal — 25 Apr 2009, 12:11

]]> 2009-04-25T00:05:44+02:00 2009-04-25T00:05:44+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8396#p8396 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 25 Apr 2009, 00:05

]]> 2009-04-24T23:00:34+02:00 2009-04-24T23:00:34+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8395#p8395 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
4.2 demo gives me 30;40 cpu average in 512ms asio4all on dual 2.33, saddly didn't check before on XP.. quite high also..

edit: on ableton live results seems same between Xp and W7, had a liveset at 50 percent still the same.

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 24 Apr 2009, 23:00

]]> 2009-04-24T19:29:31+02:00 2009-04-24T19:29:31+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8394#p8394 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]>
seems disapointing results, sad truely nice otherwise, I hesitated to buy one, I finally got back a cheap layer for mbp 15"..

edit : arf and im just about to install W7 beta...mmmm

Statistics: Posted by 23fx23 — 24 Apr 2009, 19:29

]]> 2009-04-24T18:54:56+02:00 2009-04-24T18:54:56+02:00 https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1491&p=8393#p8393 <![CDATA[tx2500 performance vs desktop]]> The default workspace that loads with Usine (4.2 beta8),running uses between 45-55% of the dual core AMD QL-62 2Ghz cpu with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting.

The same default workspace loaded and running on my intel core 2 quad core 3.5Ghz desktop with all Usine settings default, except for the multi core 2 threads setting (for comparison sake I am not using 4 threads) uses 1-2% ! (x2 = 2-4% of two cores)
Lets say that my desktop is 3x faster than the tx2500 while using only two cores, that should still only amount to 12% or maybe even 15- 20% cpu running the same workspace on the tablet, but 45-55%?

Both computers are using the same audio hardware, PCI Express/Expresscard > RME Multiface II set at a 256 sample buffer.
The desktop is running Windows XP 64-bit, the tablet is running Windows 7 evaluation/beta.

Could this big of a performance gap be because of Windows 7, or are the AMD cpu's really not very efficient?
I assume there are at least several of these tablets in use around here. What results are you getting?

Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 24 Apr 2009, 18:54

]]>