]]>2009-02-11T11:56:52+02:002009-02-11T11:56:52+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7486#p7486Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Feb 2009, 10:56
]]>2009-02-11T11:52:47+02:002009-02-11T11:52:47+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7485#p7485Statistics: Posted by bsork — 11 Feb 2009, 10:52
]]>2009-02-11T09:50:40+02:002009-02-11T09:50:40+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7483#p7483drag&drop the vst while press the [ctrl] key.
]]>2009-02-11T04:25:55+02:002009-02-11T04:25:55+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7479#p7479Ditch the sequencer and any other parts of the program not necessary for running a single patch within a host and get a lean mean single purpose vst that could be inserted multiple times, which would also have the added benefit of allowing the host to more efficiently distribute cpu load when running multiple independant patches.
Does this sound like a good idea?
Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 11 Feb 2009, 03:25
]]>BrainModularBrainModular Users Forum2009-02-12T02:00:53+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/app.php/feed/topic/13622009-02-12T02:00:53+02:002009-02-12T02:00:53+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7497#p7497Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 12 Feb 2009, 01:00
]]>2009-02-11T20:48:31+02:002009-02-11T20:48:31+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7496#p7496But I need time for that.
]]>2009-02-11T11:56:52+02:002009-02-11T11:56:52+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7486#p7486Statistics: Posted by senso — 11 Feb 2009, 10:56
]]>2009-02-11T11:52:47+02:002009-02-11T11:52:47+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7485#p7485Statistics: Posted by bsork — 11 Feb 2009, 10:52
]]>2009-02-11T09:50:40+02:002009-02-11T09:50:40+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7483#p7483drag&drop the vst while press the [ctrl] key.
]]>2009-02-11T04:25:55+02:002009-02-11T04:25:55+02:00https://brainmodular.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1362&p=7479#p7479Ditch the sequencer and any other parts of the program not necessary for running a single patch within a host and get a lean mean single purpose vst that could be inserted multiple times, which would also have the added benefit of allowing the host to more efficiently distribute cpu load when running multiple independant patches.
Does this sound like a good idea?
Statistics: Posted by gurulogic — 11 Feb 2009, 03:25